October 1, 2014

August & September Haul


Bought:
I really enjoyed The Unbecoming of Mara Dyer (my review) and have been meaning to read the sequel for quite a while. 
I loved the first two books in this trilogy and I think I'm pretty satisfied with them. With that being said, after reading the reviews for this last book, I'll probably not be reading it. Better to stop reading it when it was on a higher note. 
One-Punch Man is one of my favourite manga series. So far the English publisher has not released a print copy, only digital (I really wish they'd release print copies already!?). So this one is the Japanese edition. Definitely recommend this series, it's freakin hilarious! 

Gifted:
It was my birthday in August and my sister got me two volumes of another one of my favourite manga series - Skip Beat!. Another series I highly recommend with the main character being the best female character I've seen. I also recommend these editions, they're the price of one volume but have three volumes in them.

Trade:
A manga series about a school were everyone is a clone of a famous historical figure. I've been wanting to read this for quite a while. Not sure how it'll turn out though. 

Review:
  • Wolfsbane by Gillian Philip (Thanks to Tor)
Still haven't read the first book, Rebel Angels, but this series looks pretty intriguing. 
  • Sinner by Maggie Stiefvater (Thanks to Scholastic Canada)
Lately Stiefvater's characters are very unpleasant. She's also using extreme violence, swearing, and abuse of drugs - which to me comes off like she thinks that's cool. Did she forget she's writing young adult? My opinions for The Raven Boys and The Dreams Thieves have changed greatly after I went and looked through them again. Anyway, I'll probably be reading Sinner, but I don't have high hopes for it.
  • The Iron Trial by Cassandra Clare and Holly Black (Thanks to Scholastic Canada)
This sounds like it could be fun, but it does sound like a rip-off of Harry Potter. I think the first book is going to be a lot like Harry Potter and then as the series continues it's going to derive from it. 
  • John Diamond by Leon Garfield (Thanks to Random House Canada)
I've never heard of this and I have no idea how this one will turn out. But I liked the cover and thought the synopsis was interesting enough. If you've read John Diamond, what did you think?

September 29, 2014

Review: Bloody Cross, Volume 1

Bloody Cross, Volume 1 
by Shiwo Komeyama

Half angel, half demon, Tsukimiya must drink pure demon blood to stave off the curse that will eventually claim her life. When she meets an angel named Hinata, he’s eager to team up with the half-blood to take down a vampire that has been attacking humans. Tsukimiya is surprised to find that Hinata is a capable partner, but when the vampire is slain, it is Hinata who claims its demon blood, leaving Tsukimiya to be taken by the curse. In a last-ditch effort to save herself, Tsukimiya tries to drink Hinata’s blood, now mixed with the vampire’s pure demon blood. But in taking the blood that will save her, Tsukimiya has also transmitted the curse that will kill her. Hinata and Tsukimiya now share the curse…and they’re running out of time.

My Review:

Story: (1/5) At first the story was interesting enough, but then it got pretty chaotic. The story was straightforward to begin with: Tsukimiya is a half blood (half angel, half demon) that's cursed and will die from her mark. She meets Hinata, one thing leads to another, and they both end up sharing the curse. Now as the story continues from there, the manga kept adding all these random characters and conflicts and I just got confused and bored. I was also annoyed with all the fake deaths. I hate when the plot twist is "Oh, wait they didn't die, they're alive!"

Main Character: (1/5) Seems to have two main characters: Tsukimiya and Hinata

Tsukimiya is one of those cold girls. But I've seen those types of girls in manga/anime so much that she didn't really wow me or leave me with a strong impression. 

Hinata was kinda of annoying. I didn't like his overly flirtatious and fickle personality. I didn't like how you were never sure who's side he was on or how you were never sure if he was serious or not. He's just an annoying character overall. I feel this comes more from the author not being sure what kind of personality she wants him to have.

Other Characters: (1/5) Ugh, the other characters were all poorly constructed and obnoxious. I really didn't like any of them. They also added a new plotline that didn't seem to have anything to do with Tsukimiya and Hinata. Why would you add a new conflict so early in the manga when you haven't really finished with the other one? This manga would have been so much better if the author just focused on the two main characters and their adventures in trying to undo the curse or something. 

Setting: (1/5) The setting was really bad. I wasn't sure what era they were in. Modern, past, or some alternate universe. Not to mention there were barely any backgrounds so the characters were usually in this white void. 

Artwork: (1/5) If you couldn't already tell from the cover, the author seems to have no idea how to draw a normal-portioned human. The result is pretty laughable. There's barely any backgrounds so the characters usually look like they're in a white void. Probably some of the worst artwork I've seen. The author also didn't do any original character designs or outfits or anything that might have at least made this manga more unique.

Overall: (5/25) The main characters were nothing special and the art is terrible. The plot gets too chaotic and random characters are introduced later on. Not to mention there isn't a single original thing about Bloody Cross. It's just a bunch of rehashed overused ideas. I'm dropping this manga. I don't see it getting any better, on the contrary I see it getting worse. 

August 24, 2014

Review: Anna and the French Kiss

Anna and the French Kiss
by Stephanie Perkins

Release Date: December 2, 2010
Publisher: Dutton
Age Group: Young Adult
Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

Anna is looking forward to her senior year in Atlanta, where she has a great job, a loyal best friend, and a crush on the verge of becoming more. Which is why she is less than thrilled about being shipped off to boarding school in Paris--until she meets √Čtienne St. Clair. Smart, charming, beautiful, √Čtienne has it all...including a serious girlfriend.

But in the City of Light, wishes have a way of coming true. Will a year of romantic near-misses end with their long-awaited French kiss?

My Review:

Cover: OK, this has to be one of the worst covers I have ever seen, but considering the synopsis of this book, I'm not surprised the marketing team didn't put in much effort.

Writing: (1/5) The writing is childish, it sounds like an airhead of a teenage girl wrote it.

Setting: (1.25/5) There were some nice places described in France, but this book was such a poor excuse to put a bunch of teenagers together without any parental supervision. Why Anna was even sent to France is so laughably explained too.  

Plot: (1/5) You'd think from the synopsis that this is a cute and fluffy story and that's what I thought before I started it. But it felt like the author was totally serious when she wrote this book. To say the least, it's poorly done. It reminds me of one those stories teenage girls write on wattpad or their school story assignments. I'm not even sure how this managed to get published or why it's so popular. Is it because everyone thought it was cute and sweet?

It's not. It really isn't.

This is trash. It's poorly written. The whole book revolves around Anna wanting a guy who's already dating somebody. I have no idea why reading this would appeal to anyone. I don't know, I assume girls just self-insert themselves into Anna or something.

Main Character: (1/5) At first you think Anna starts out like a nice and cute girl, but the more I read, the more I disliked Anna. Why the hell does she go after someone with a girlfriend? She acts very cruelly to the girl too!? None of her actions are justified. She's just an all around horrible person. 

Other Characters: (1/5) I really, really don't understand why everyone is in love with St. Clair. I do not see the appeal. He's a poorly constructed character. HA! Constructed, that's rich. I'm not sure what his personality is even supposed to be. The author keeps saying he's gorgeous but yeah I don't see it. I just imagine a flat character. I don't understand why everyone loves him. Is it because he has a British accent, is rich, and "apparently" gorgeous? I'm sorry, but I really only see girls inserting themselves into Anna and pretending that a guy would choose them over their girlfriend because they're so wonderful.

The other characters were a joke. St. Clair's pack of friends, his girlfriend, and not to mention that mean girl who hates Anna. That's one of the worst mean girl characters I've seen and I've seen countless.

Romance: (1/5) Anna was such an unlikable character and St. Clair was an awful character. Not to mention this whole thing was wrong. Really, the guy has a girlfriend!? Why the hell didn't he just break up with her sooner? To make this book last the longest it can go probably

Overall: (6.25/30) This book is a joke. It's just so bad. I'm not sure why people like it. I'm not even sure how it got published. Must have been the biggest fluke ever.

August 23, 2014

Review: Peter Pan

Peter Pan 
by J.M. Barrie

Release Date: July 11, 2013
Publisher: Puffin
Age Group: Children
Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

One starry night, Peter Pan and Tinker Bell lead the three Darling children over the rooftops of London and away to Neverland--the island where lost boys play, mermaids splash and fairies make mischief. But a villainous-looking gang of pirates lurk in the docks, led by the terrifying Captain James Hook. Magic and excitement are in the air, but if Captain Hook has his way, before long, someone will be walking the plank and swimming with the crocodiles...

My Review:

Cover: I really love this Puffin Chalk edition. The cover is a chalk illustration and the book and font are the perfect size. 

Writing: (2/5) At first I really loved the writing and I found so many lines and descriptions that I really loved:

“When the first baby laughed for the first time, its laugh broke into a thousand pieces, and they all went skipping about, and that was the beginning of fairies.”

But there were so many times where I had to reread a line or paragraph. No matter how many times or how carefully I read it, I could not understand what the author was trying to say. 

The author also had this annoying habit of letting the narrator tell you what will happen in the future and it basically spoiled huge portions of the book. This was also jarring because one second he's talking about what's presently going on and then next he's talking about what will happen. The first time he did this, I was so confused about what was going on and what the characters were talking about. 

Setting: (2/5) I really liked the idea of Neverland with the pirates, beasts, fairies, mermaids, and the Piccaninny tribe.

But I felt that Neverland was barely explored. Most of the book was set either in the Darlings' house in London, or Peter Pan and the Lost Boy's home in Neverland.

Plot: (2/5) The plot was fun up until Wendy and her brothers got to Neverland, then it just got really awful and chaotic. The book became more and more of a mind screw and the children became more and more demonic. When Wendy landed on the island, one of the boys shot her with an arrow to the heart. Wendy becomes more and more unhealthily attached to Peter (even when she's a fully grown woman). The boys kill pirates near the end. Looking back, I don't understand what the whole point of this book and the characters' actions was, but I guess it was to illustrate the author's theme.

The book has a really terrible theme "the selfishness of childhood". That's basically what the whole book is about. Wendy and her brothers are selfish. Peter Pan is selfish. The Lost Boys are selfish. You won't find one child here who's sweet or has any good traits.The more you read, the more demonic they become. They disappear without a trace and go on adventures not caring how worried their parents are for them.

The author has this disgusting idea that little children are selfish and they don't care about their parents' feelings. They're not selfish, they're innocent. They don't know any better. There's a difference. And I don't know about you, but anytime a kid sees their parents unhappy or sad, they tend to burst into tears. The author never had any children of his own and that doesn't surprise me.

Main Character: (2/5) Some people consider Wendy to be the main character, but I personally consider Peter Pan to be. He is the center of the story and really the whole point. Wendy can be taken out completely and we'd still have a story, but Peter Pan cannot be taken out so easily. He is the story. 

Now, don't get me wrong, I really love the idea of Peter Pan. The whole idea. I like his name. I like that he's a boy that never grows up. That he still has his first teeth and a baby's gurgle. I like that he wears clothes made of skeleton leaves and can talk to fairies. But that's it. I really love the whole idea behind Peter Pan, but I hate the execution.

For one, what was the point of the Darling family? They just distracted from Peter Pan and Neverland.

Another thing is that Peter Pan was inconsistent. The author did not give us a specific age. From his descriptions of him, I guess him to be around 8? But from how he acts in the story and how all the girls are in love with him (Wendy, Wendy's mom, Tiger Lily, Tinkerbell) you think he was a teenager.

Peter Pan was also very disturbing. He kills others on a regular basis. He constantly forgets his experiences or who someone is to preserve his youth. And mentioned very offhandedly: "Sometimes, though not often, he had dreams, and they were more painful than the dreams of other boys. For hours he could not be separated from these dreams, though he wailed piteously in them."

Also, for the life of me, I really don't know what his personality is. Is he a little boy that likes adventure and fun? Is he cruel and savage? Is he nice? I really don't know. Every personality trait you can think of, Peter Pan has shown it.

Overall, I love the idea of Peter Pan, but that's it. It was a good idea, but the author used it terribly. I actually preferred other portrayals of Peter Pan, like Peter Pan from the TV series Once Upon A Time. You know an author is terrible when people can use their own ideas better than them.

Villain: (3/5) Captain Hook is easily the best character. Again, like Peter Pan, I really liked the idea but his personality was inconsistent. He was supposed to be very calm and intelligent, but he is the complete opposite of this sometimes in the book.

Also, the author kept telling and telling you about Hook. He really never showed you anything. It was all telling. Hook was this, Hook is thinking this, Hook is going to do that, etc.

I did like his ending though, I'll give him that. 

Other Characters: (1/5) What I hate the most about this book was all the other characters (besides Hook's crew):

Wendy Darling: I liked Wendy from the Disney adaption and I thought she would be similar, but yeah right she was. I hate Wendy. For one, can't she pick if she wants to be Peter Pan's mother or his girlfriend? She acts like she's both, which is distributing. She does not care about the other boys' horrible actions and even encourages it. But at the end of the day I hated how, like every female in the book - and I mean every female (Wendy, her mom, Tinkerbell, Tiger Lily, the mermaids, even a female BIRD) - cannot keep their hands off Peter. It's disgusting. He's a little boy. And is that all the female characters amount to? Being part of Peter's Pan's little harem and having a cat fight over him?

John and Michael Darling: Easily the two most boring and useless characters. There was the Lost Boys, so what was the point of them?

Mrs. Darling: I have no idea why there's so much stress on Mrs. Darling. The author goes into more detail for her than he does with anyone else, besides maybe Hook. Also it was creepy how she acted around Peter Pan, as if she had a thing for him like the rest of the females in this book. She's also such a ghastly portrayal of a fake and stereotypical mother.

Mr. Darling: Mr. Darling is constantly abused by the other characters and the author to appalling degrees. Also, like Mrs. Darling, he's such a stereotypical father.

Tinkerbell: I liked the idea of Tinkerbell. Her talking sounds like bells, the whole mythology of the fairies, and her being Peter's companion. But she's such a horrible little creature. She tried to kill Wendy numerous times because of her jealousy. She's portrayed more sympathetically in the Disney movie, but not at all in the book.

The Lost Boys: There's six Lost Boys. The author introduced all of them in the same breath, so I never had any idea who's who. The Lost Boys were a waste of space.

Overall: (12/30) Peter Pan had loads and loads of great ideas: Peter Pan, Hook, Tinkerbell, Neverland, etc. But that's it. That as far as it went. He barely focused on or used the ideas to their full potential. Not to mention the book had a horrible theme and most of the characters were terrible people. The book was extremely unpleasant to read.

I don't recommend reading Peter Pan. Watch the Disney version, it's a hundred times better. 

August 22, 2014

July Haul



Bought:
I've already read it and enjoyed it. It was as good as Shadow & Bone (my review). My review will be posted soon.

I probably won't be reading the last one though. I'm staying away from last books in series because they're usually terrible. I also spoiled Ruin & Rising and the author undid something that makes you wonder what the point of reading this entire trilogy was. 
This is the Shakespeare play I want to read the most. I've been wanting to read it since I watched the anime, Blast of Tempest, which is based off it. The Tempest seems to have a lot of fantasy elements like Ariel the air spirit and I'm excited to see how it turns out. 

Trade:
I really enjoyed the first book in this trilogy - A Great and Terrible Beauty. I've read it quite a while ago though, so I'll be rereading it before I continue on with the trilogy. I recommend A Great and Terrible Beauty for those that want a good book set in the Victorian times.

Review:
  • Half a King by Joe Abercrombie (Thanks to Random House Canada)
This one seems like it can be read as a stand alone. There aren't many stand alone fantasy books and I'm curious to see how this will turn out.
This is the first book in a new fantasy series based off middle east mythology/folkore, which is different. 
  • Afterworlds by Scott Westerfeld (Thanks to Simon & Schuster Canada)
I really should have read the synopsis before requesting this one. Westerfeld's books are usually very different and interesting reads and that's way I expected this one to be good. After reading the synopsis and the reviews though, this book sounds awful. It alternates between a girl's adventures in New York and her YA novel. That sounds like a disaster waiting to happen and both stories sound boring. Also, making it about a girl who's a YA writer is such a cheap way to appeal to the audience. I probably won't be reading this one.
  • Complicit by Stephanie Kuehn (Thanks to St. Martin's Press)
A lot of people seemed to have enjoyed this one and I want to read more stand alones. 
This is a Russian epic fairy tale in the form of a poem. I've been trying to branch out more in what I read. I really hope the translation is decent, but otherwise this sounds like it could be a fun read.
  • Sketcher by Roland Watson-Grant (Thanks to Alma Books)
This one sounds very different than what I usually read, but it could be really good for all I know. If anyone has read Sketcher, what did you think?
I really enjoyed A Little Princess and The Secret Garden seems to be more popular than it, so I have high hopes for it.  
  • Heidi by Johanna Spyri (Thanks to Random House UK)
I don't know if this will be really good or really boring. I vaguely remember watching a kids TV series based off it though.
  • Little Women by Louisa May Alcott (Thanks to Random House UK)
  • Good Wives by Louisa May Alcott (Thanks to Random House UK)
I've already read Little Women and its sequel, but I wanted to reread them, considering it was such a long time ago.
  • Ballet Shoes by Noel Streatfeild (Thanks to The Collector’s Library)
I remember watching the 2007 film of this and liking it. 

Freebies:
  • Vicious (by Victoria Schwab) cards & bookplate (Thanks to the author)
The author is giving away trading cards (& a signed bookplate I guess) to whoever reviews her book Vicious (my review). If you're interested, more information can be found here

August 21, 2014

Review: The Sky is Everywhere

The Sky is Everywhere
by Jandy Nelson

Release Date: March 22, 2011
Publisher: Speak
Age Group: Young Adult
Rating: 1 2 3 4 5

Lennie plays second clarinet in the school orchestra and has always happily been second fiddle to her charismatic older sister, Bailey. Then Bailey dies suddenly, and Lennie is left at sea without her anchor. Overcome by emotion, Lennie soon finds herself torn between two boys: Bailey's boyfriend, Toby, and Joe, the charming and musically gifted new boy in town. While Toby can't see her without seeing Bailey and Joe sees her only for herself, each offers Lennie something she desperately needs. But ultimately, it's up to Lennie to find her own way toward what she really needs-without Bailey. A remarkable debut novel perfect for fans of Sarah Dessen, Deb Caletti, and Francesca Lia Block.

My Review:

Cover: The paperback cover is so much better than the hardcover version. I think it suits the story a lot better and I like that it's bright and cheery.

Writing: (2/5) The author is a poet who first intended The Sky is Everywhere to be a novel in verse. What I like about the writing is that there aren't any unnecessary words or lines. The author uses minimal language to describe things. And of course the writing is very beautiful, it's very pretty. There were many lines I liked that I underlined.

But despite that, what I really didn't like is how the book makes you feel extremely happy and extremely depressed at the same time. This is apparently what the author intended according to an interview:

"I imagined a story where joy and sorrow cohabited in really close quarters, where love could be almost as unwieldy as grief."

She also said (concerning the main character, Lennie):

"She’s taking steps that will propel her into the future when she’s suddenly clobbered (not for the first time) by the realization that she has a future and Bailey doesn't. It’s agony for her and it occurs to her that grief is forever, that it will be with her always, step for step, breath for breath, but she also realizes in this moment that this is true because grief and love are conjoined and you can’t have one without the other. Grief is always going to be a measure of the love lost."

Honestly that sounds like you're still grieving. That you haven't gotten over someone's death. Grief fades with time, I believe it always does. Grief fades when you learn to let go. Love stays. Grief, shouldn't.

You're not happy if you're grief-stricken at the same time, that doesn't make any sense.

At the heart of it, that's what I dislike about this book. This theme, that makes me feel simultaneously happy and sad. And looking back at the novel, what stayed with me was the grief and the sad, which doesn't make it a very good novel at all. It's depressing looking back at it and yes, losing someone you love is sad. Everyone knows that. So this novel did not teach me anything new.

Setting: (2.5/5) I really liked the town of Clover where the book is set and all its beautiful landscape. It was a nice setting, but the tone and mood was dreamlike and grief stricken and I couldn't focus on the setting. It was also a stark contrast to the otherwise cheerful and the nature and landscape filled town. 

Plot: (2/5) While reading this book, there were times where I really, really enjoyed it. And then there were times where I really wanted to just stop reading and even drop it. It's probably because of how the book makes you feel depressed at times and happy at times.

The plot of the book is basically like the summary. A girl tries to get over her dead sister. Two guys help her with her grief. One in a bad way and one in a good way.

The plot, to the say least, was one of the most cliche plots I've ever come across. I've seen this type of story before, everyone has. There's so many ways you could have dealt with the topic of grief, why choose this one?

Not to mention I hate that she uses guys to get over her sister. Why does there even have to be love interests in this type of story? It's so cheap and unrealistic. I hate the whole idea of love interests in fiction helping someone get over their issues. You have to get over it yourself.  A crutch won't help you get stronger.

To be fair, on some level, Lennie does get through her grief on her own, but the inclusion of the two boys takes up most of the story. 

Main Character: (1/5) Lennie is unlikable to say the least. She's also flat and has no personality, but she does something that I can't forgive. She starts lusting after her dead sister's boyfriend (who her sister loved very dearly) to get over her grief!?

Obviously she realizes that's wrong, but I can't forgive her for doing this in the first place. How can you even pretend to have loved your sister if you did this!?

Lennie also writes poems and scatters them across town. I thought she was into music, I'm not sure how she can write poetry or if she even likes it. The poem and scattering them thing seems to be something the author is into and not necessarily the character.

Other Characters: (2.5/5)
Toby Shaw: Bailey's (Lennie's sister) boyfriend. I hate him just as much as Lennie, if not more. He basically does the same as Lennie. He lusts after his dead girlfriend's sister to get over his grief.

Joe Fontaine: The new half-French guy every girl wants. I did like Joe's extremely cheerful personality, I really did. I could have adored his character in another story, but in this story I find his presence unwelcome.

Lennie's Grandmother and Uncle: I really liked them and their place in the story. They're probably in all my favourite parts of the book.

Sarah: Lennie's friend. She's extremely annoying and poorly constructed.

Romance: (1/5) As I mentioned above, the inclusion of love interests in a story about grief just cheapens the whole thing for me.

Overall: (11/30) Right after I finished reading this book, I loved it. But very soon after, I just got sad and depressed the more and more I remembered the book. I think the book has a bad theme which is the heart of the whole story. The flat and unlikable main character doesn't help, nor does the inclusion of love interests which cheapens a story about grief. I don't recommend The Sky is Everywhere.

August 14, 2014

Blog Tour: Recipe Reveal (and Giveaway) with Yangsze Choo, Author of The Ghost Bride

The Ghost Bride
by Yangsze Choo
William Morrow Paperbacks
August 5, 2014 (paperback)

Yangsze Choo’s stunning debut, The Ghost Bride, is a startlingly original novel infused with Chinese folklore, romantic intrigue, and unexpected supernatural twists. 

Li Lan, the daughter of a respectable Chinese family in colonial Malaysia, hopes for a favorable marriage, but her father has lost his fortune, and she has few suitors. Instead, the wealthy Lim family urges her to become a “ghost bride” for their son, who has recently died under mysterious circumstances. Rarely practiced, a traditional ghost marriage is used to placate a restless spirit. Such a union would guarantee Li Lan a home for the rest of her days, but at what price?

Night after night, Li Lan is drawn into the shadowy parallel world of the Chinese afterlife, where she must uncover the Lim family’s darkest secrets—and the truth about her own family. 

Reminiscent of Lisa See’s Peony in Love and Amy Tan’s The Bonesetter’s Daughter, The Ghost Bride is a wondrous coming-of-age story and from a remarkable new voice in fiction.

Recipe Reveal: 
Teh Tarik

As a former British colony, Malaysia has a long and rich history of independent little coffee shops, or kopitiam, as they’re known by locals. These are usually little shophouses with round marble topped tables and the iconic Polish bentwood chairs that used to be so common. You can sit under the lazily spinning ceiling fans and order toast with butter and kaya (a kind of caramelized egg custard jam), soft-boiled eggs, and a wide variety of tea and coffee drinks. 

One of the most beloved drinks you can find in a kopitiam is teh tarik. Teh means tea, and tarik means “to pull”. It’s basically a cup of perfectly frothed milky tea that’s made by pouring hot tea from one cup to another. The more expert you are, the further the distance between the two cups, and when it’s done right, it looks effortless, as though the stream of tea is being pulled between the two cups. 

Although it takes some practice to do, it’s an entertaining and fun way to serve tea to your guests, though practicing outdoors makes it easier to clean up spills! Try it some time and see. 

Teh Tarik

- Make strong tea. The traditional way to make this is to use 4 teaspoons of tea dust or broken tea leaves per cup. Add 1 cup boiling water, let it steep for 5 minutes, then strain through a cotton strainer or “sock” (not a real one though!). If you don’t have tea dust, choose a robust tea like Malaysian Boh tea from Cameron Highlands, or Lipton black tea and use 2-3 tea bags per cup. Steeo longer if you want a stronger brew.

- Next, add about ½ inch of sweetened condensed milk per cup of tea. More if you have a sweet tooth, and less if you don’t, but in kopitiams, tea and coffee are generally served very sweet and strong. Stir to mix. If you prefer thinner tea, you can add milk and reduce the amount of condensed milk. If you have a very sweet tooth, you can add more sugar.

-Now comes the tarik part! Traditionally, this is done by putting the tea into two stainless steel mugs and pouring it from one to another. As you pour, the tea becomes cooler and frothier. The higher you pour from, the better the quality of bubbles. People say that the flavours blend well and it tastes better. 

Fun facts: 

If you’re ever in Malaysia or Singapore, here’s a glossary of kopitiam terms so you can order like a local!

Teh - tea
Kopi - coffee
Chum - tea and coffee mixed together
Teh/kopi oh - Hot tea/coffee served black with sugar
Teh/kopi see - tea/coffee with evaporated milk (less sweet than regular teh or kopi)
Teh/kopi kosong - black tea/coffee with no milk or sugar (kosong means “empty”)
Teh halia - hot tea with ginger. This is especially good when you’re not feeling well or have a cold.





[Photo captions: 1. Our local teh tarik guy in Malaysia. A professional like him can get a lot of height while pouring! 2. The tea has a nice head of bubbles, rather like beer]


About the Author:
Yangsze Choo is a fourth generation Chinese from Malaysia. After graduating from Harvard, she worked in various corporate jobs while secretly writing fiction between financial spreadsheets. Now a stay-at-home-mum, she writes late at night when her kids have (finally!) gone to sleep. Yangsze Choo eats and read too much and often does both at her blog www.yschoo.com


Giveaway:
a Rafflecopter giveaway

Check out the rest of the blog tour:
4th Guest Blog @ Fire & Ice 
5th Character Spotlight @ Pages From My Thoughts 
6th Author Interview @ The Mod Podge Bookshelf
7th Recipe Reveal @ Pieces of Whimsy
8th Character Spotlight @ Gobs and Gobs of Books
11th Guest Blog @ A Dream Within A Dream
12th Recipe Reveal @ Bookish Things and More
13th Author Interview @ Bibliophelia, Please
14th Recipe Reveal @ Fantasy's Ink
15th Character Spotlight @ Addicted Readers